The 2017-18 Australian Budget – pragmatism and fairness rule


10 May 2017

The 2017-18 Australian Budget – pragmatism and fairness rule

The 2017-18 Australian Budget – pragmatism and fairness rule

Key points

Introduction

The 2017-18 Budget has much to make it popular. In fact, the goodies make it almost feel like a pre-election rather than a post-election budget. The transformation from the austerity to end “the age of entitlement” of the 2014 budget to the “fairness, security and opportunity” of this Budget has been profound.1

Key budget measures

As always, most of the key new measures were pre-announced or leaked. On the spending front, the goodies include:

  • A further ramp up in infrastructure spending (by an additional $20bn over the forward years) including Western Sydney Airport, inland rail & various road projects.
  • Extending the small business $20,000 asset write-off scheme and working with states to remove red-tape.
  • A housing package: first home buyers can save via their super for a deposit out of pre-tax income (up $30,000), retirees who downsize get exemptions from super limits, more stringent rules on foreign investors (eg, vacant home tax), encouraging the supply of low cost community housing and rewarding states for boosting supply.
  • Increased spending on health through committing to fully fund the National Disability Insurance Scheme and reintroducing Medicare rebate indexation.
  • Removal of the “zombie” welfare cuts.
  • $18.6bn over ten years in extra school funding (Gonski 2.0).

This has been offset by various savings, including:

  • Increased university fees.
  • An increase in the Medicare levy by 0.5% from 2019.
  • A 0.6% levy on the major banks with liabilities over $100bn.
  • More measures to curtail the cash economy and improve the integrity of the tax and welfare system.

Little change to the deficit outlook

Despite a temporary boost to corporate tax revenue from a bounce in the iron ore price, extra spending and soft personal tax collections on the back of weak wages growth means the near-term budget deficit outlook is a bit worse than MYEFO and $2.3bn worse over four years compared to last year’s budget. The return to surplus has been maintained for 2020-21 and looks better at 0.4% of GDP. After a 2016-17 budget deficit of $37.6bn, the deficit for 2017-18 is forecast to be $29.4bn (1.6% of GDP).


Underlying cash budget balance projections


Source: Australian Treasury, AMP Capital


With the Government offsetting all new spending with savings, the actual policy impact on the economy this year and next is trivial (see the red figures in the table above). However, the projected decline in the budget deficit in the years ahead means that fiscal policy will still be acting as drag on growth.


Source: Australian Treasury, AMP Capital


Economic assumptions

The major economic assumptions underpinning the Budget are shown in the next table. Most of the assumptions look reasonable, except that the assumption that wages growth rises to 3.75% over the next four years looks too optimistic given unemployment is not expected to fall much. The iron ore price is still expected to average $US55/tonne over the next four years. This looks reasonable albeit the recent volatility in the iron ore price highlights the uncertainty around it.


Economic assumptions

Source: Australian Treasury, AMP Capital


Assessment and risks

The goodies and the focus on fairness in the Budget should provide a bit of a boost to confidence and spending. But the risks around the projected return to surplus remain huge. Australia still has a budget deficit problem. Government spending surged 25% between 2006-07 and 2008-09 to combat the GFC and this has never been unwound. While our net public debt to GDP ratio is low compared to the US, Europe and Japan, comparing ourselves to a bad bunch is dangerous. The Budget is projecting a 12 year run of deficits totalling 27% of GDP which swamps the deficits of the 1980s and 1990s. And this is without the deep recessions of the early 1980s and 1990s! Rather we have achieved this thanks to a combination of ramping up spending on a whole range of things without facing up to how they will be paid for.

Unfortunately after 102 quarters without a recession there is no support for hard-nosed economic reform in Australia and this also applies to reforms to limit spending growth. So we continue to rely inordinately on assuming the best to drive revenue up. This is evident in the Budget’s projections for average revenue growth of a whopping 6.7% per annum over the next four years. Such optimistic assumptions have disappointed in recent years and the biggest risk now is that wages don’t accelerate as assumed leading to continuing poor personal tax collections.

While the Budget still projects a return to surplus by 2020-21, it remains pretty thin and the budget deficit projections over the next two years actually take us further away from a surplus not closer. The trouble is we don’t have a lot of flexibility to provide stimulus should the economy turn down. While the 2017-18 Budget should help us keep our AAA sovereign rating for now, the risk remains high that we lose it at some point.



Implied from Budget Papers from 1921-22. Source: Aust Treasury, AMP Capital


On infrastructure, the Budget has much to commend it. Infrastructure spending can help short term growth, boost long term productivity and can actually “crowd in” private investment. Increased public investment is helping to offset weak private investment (see the next chart) and the infrastructure commitment in the Budget will help ensure this continues.



Source: ABS, AMP Capital


In this regard, the move to report a “net operating balance” in this year’s Budget is welcome and there is much merit in focusing debt on capital spending and not recurrent spending. But debt is still debt and there is always the risk some of the infrastructure projects turn out to be white elephants resulting in “good debt” becoming “bad”.

Finally, it’s commendable to see housing affordability being a key part of this Budget. Certainly the measures are to be welcomed, particularly those helping first home buyers, downsizers and measures to boost supply. Getting housing supply up on a sustainable basis is critical so the key is for the Federal Government to follow through with its plan to incentivise states to meet housing supply targets.

Implications for the RBA

While this Budget should provide a boost to confidence (albeit not for university students), ongoing fiscal tightening will act as a mild drag on growth in the years ahead. As such, it’s hard to see major implications for the RBA. In fact recent data on trade and retail sales continues to point to more risk of a rate cut than a rate hike in Australia this year.

Implications for Australian assets

Cash and term deposits – with interest rates remaining low, returns from cash and bank term deposits will remain low.

Bonds – a major impact on the bond market from the Budget is unlikely. With five year bond yields at 2.2%, it’s hard to see great returns from sovereign bonds over the next few years.

Shares – the potential boost to confidence from this Budget could be a small positive for the Australian share market. Overall, the Budget’s impact is unlikely to be huge. Construction stocks may be beneficiaries and banks losers.

Property – the Budget’s housing affordability measures may have an impact on home prices over time if they incentivize states to ramp up supply, but it’s likely to be marginal in the short term. We continue to expect momentum in the Sydney and Melbourne property markets to slow.

Infrastructure – the ramp up in infrastructure spending should in time provide more opportunities for private investors as many of the resultant assets are ultimately privatised.

The $A – the Budget alone is unlikely to have much impact on the $A. With the iron ore price falling back again, the interest rate differential in favour of Australia continuing to narrow and the $A still too high, the downtrend in the $A is likely to resume.


What does the budget mean for investors?

Dr. Shane Oliver – Head of Investment Strategy & Chief Economist


Concluding comments

The 2017-18 Budget has a sensible focus on housing affordability and infrastructure. The main risks remain around the revenue assumptions and when we will get back to surplus.

Contact us to discuss how the Federal Budget may impact your personal financial situation.


Olivers Insights - By Shane Oliver

Dr Shane Oliver
Head of Investment Strategy and Economics and Chief Economist

1This note prepared with the help of Diana Mousina, Economist, AMP Capital.


Dr Shane Oliver About the Author  Dr Shane Oliver, Head of Investment Strategy and Economics and Chief Economist at AMP Capital is responsible for AMP Capital’s diversified investment funds. He also provides economic forecasts and analysis of key variables and issues affecting, or likely to affect, all asset markets.


Important note: While every care has been taken in the preparation of this document, AMP Capital Investors Limited (ABN 59 001 777 591, AFSL 232497) and AMP Capital Funds Management Limited (ABN 15 159 557 721, AFSL 426455) make no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of any statement in it including, without limitation, any forecasts. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. This document has been prepared for the purpose of providing general information, without taking account of any particular investor’s objectives, financial situation or needs. An investor should, before making any investment decisions, consider the appropriateness of the information in this document, and seek professional advice, having regard to the investor’s objectives, financial situation and needs. This document is solely for the use of the party to whom it is provided. © Copyright 2017 AMP Capital Investors Limited. All rights reserved.


Original Source AMP Capital Ltd  & For the full coverage, go to AMP Capital’s 2017-18 Federal Budget page

Take the first step towards your financial future. 

If you need help with personalised advice on financial planning, be it wealth strategies or protection for you or your family, or a need to discuss your present or future retirement options give us a call today on 03 6343 1007.  


Alternatively send us a message or simply book an appointment now with one of our qualified financial planners on our online booking service at a mutually acceptable time.




Copyright © FinancialPartners Blog  All Rights Reserved


Feel free to copy and share this but include the entire article and reference back to this site thanks.

FinancialPartners (Tas) Pty Ltd ABN 26 160 284 739 is an Authorised Representative and Credit Representative of AMP Financial Planning Pty Limited ABN 89 051 208 327 Australian Financial Services Licence 232706 and Australian Credit Licence 232706.


‘This blog post contains information that is general in nature. It does not not take into account the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular person.  Because of this, before acting on any advice, you need to consider your financial situation and needs before making any decisions based on this information.


 You should consult a financial planner to consider how appropriate the advice is to your objectives, financial situation and needs.

 If you decide to purchase or vary a financial product, your financial adviser, AMP Financial Planning and other companies within the AMP Group may receive fees and other benefits. The fees will be a dollar amount and/ or a percentage of either the premium you pay or the value of your investment. Please contact us if you want more information.


 

Leave a Reply

  • Just a small sample of some of our previous blog posts

    • Why Australian property won’t collapse
      16th March 2016 Why Australian property won’t collapse Stronger than feared profit results and reasonable economic data in Australia, which are consistent with a rebalancing of the economy away from mining, are among the factors ......
    • The plunging oil price – why and what it means
      The plunging oil price – why and what it means 08 January 2015 Key points > Oil prices have fallen more than 50% over the last year driven largely by a surge in supply relative to demand. > Further weakness to around $US40/barrel is ......
    • Where are we in the investment cycle?
      28 April 2015 Where are we in the investment cycle? Introduction It is now six years since the global financial crisis ended. From their 2009 lows US shares are up 212%, global shares are up 159% and Australian shares are up 91% (held back ......
    • Diversifying inside super
      Diversifying inside super Find out what it is, how it works and why it matters to you What is diversification? Diversification is a risk strategy that lets you ride the ups and downs of investing. It reduces your exposure to risk, so your ......
    • It pays to contribute to your partner’s super
      It pays to contribute to your partner’s super If your spouse is a stay-at-home parent, working part-time or out of work, adding to their super could benefit you both financially. If your spouse (husband, wife, de facto or same-sex ......

The 2017-18 Australian Budget – pragmatism and fairness rule

time to read: 8 min